Always free
The call and the proof
- Official winner and win probability
- Publication time and current status
- Public Track Record, including misses
- Fight schedules and fighter records
How Blueprint MMA works
The Oracle is Blueprint MMA’s forecast engine. For every UFC fight, four AI advocates, two for each fighter, argue from verified stats and fight history. Two independent adjudicators weigh all four cases and return a winner, a win probability, and the likely method and round. Every official forecast is published before the fight and graded after it. Custom Matchup Reports run the same AI debate on any two supported fighters and stay separate from the record.
The simple version
Choose a path, see the value first, pay only for the depth you want, and verify every official result afterward.
Follow a real fight week for official picks, or choose two supported fighters for a current, future, or hypothetical Custom Matchup Report.
For published scheduled fights, the winner, win probability, publication time, and public result are open to everyone. No payment details required.
Use an Event Pass for one published card, Sharp for every official full breakdown, Whale for market tools, or a report credit for one fresh Custom Matchup Report.
Official scheduled picks become wins, misses, or voids on the public Track Record. Custom Matchup Reports stay separate and never inflate it.
See value before you buy
Always free
Choose your access
A free account includes one starter custom report after email verification. No card required.
Event Pass covers one published card. Sharp covers every official full breakdown. Whale adds the Betting Desk. Report packs add Custom Matchup Reports without a subscription.
Compare accessBehind the pick
Official picks and Custom Matchup Reports both use the advocate and adjudicator approach. Official fights are published and graded; custom reports stay private and separate. The schedule shows exactly which official fights are ready.
the right fighters and rules
The schedule, fighter names, bout order, rounds, and publication deadline are checked before analysis begins.
the same sources for both cases
One saved evidence file records the research cutoff, keeps sportsbook prices out of the official pick, and marks missing information instead of inventing it.
four AI advocates, two adjudicators
Four AI advocates work in parallel, two for each fighter from different model providers. Each builds the strongest case for one fighter from the same verified evidence and a server computed factor digest. Two adjudicators weigh all four cases, the counterevidence, and what is still uncertain, then pick the fighter more likely to win. Blueprint checks the structured forecast before it publishes. Sportsbook prices never reach the debate, and no one changes the winner by hand.
one coherent fight report
Blueprint checks the evidence and probabilities, then publishes only when the free pick and every paid section agree.
For curious readers
The plain-language details from card confirmation through public grading.
After the previous card is settled and reviewed, Blueprint can begin the next confirmed card. It checks the lineup, bout order, rounds, main event, and deadline, with a 72-hour backstop.
The lineup becomes one saved version. Duplicate fighters, substitutions, or incomplete identities stop the process before analysis.
Each fight gets a separate, source-backed evidence file with a clear cutoff, citations, disagreements, and missing categories.
Four AI advocates work in parallel, two for each fighter from different model providers, each making one fighter’s strongest supported case. Two independent adjudicators then weigh all four arguments and any conflicting sources, asking who can establish their approach in open space, against the fence, and on the ground.
Blueprint verifies source citations, bilateral support, and probability consistency. A disclosed deterministic policy may cap confidence for history-informed or highly asymmetric samples, but it cannot flip the winner or use market prices.
The official pick, full breakdown, and proof record go live together. The schedule shows exactly how many fights are available.
The final pre-fight version enters the public Track Record. Cancelled fights are void, and completed fights are graded after the event.
Blueprint organizes research into 7 evidence areas. The advocates and the adjudicators judge their relevance to this matchup without fixed category weights. Missing statistics do not become zero performance, and unknown tactical mechanisms remain unknown.
Four AI advocates work in parallel, two for each fighter from different model providers. Each builds the strongest case for one fighter from the same verified evidence and a server computed factor digest. Two adjudicators weigh all four cases, the counterevidence, and what is still uncertain, then pick the fighter more likely to win. Blueprint checks the structured forecast before it publishes. Sportsbook prices never reach the debate, and no one changes the winner by hand.
These are evidence areas, not fixed weights. Missing tactical detail stays unknown, and verified career history can still inform the forecast.
More information is not always better information. Hype, unsupported rumors, and noisy signals stay out when they cannot be checked well enough to improve the call.
Too unreliable, too situational, or too low-yield to move a serious forecast. No staredown ever changed who has the better chin.
Blueprint can start the next confirmed card after the previous card is settled and reviewed, with a 72-hour backstop. A real lineup change can trigger a refreshed pick before the deadline. Odds movement alone cannot rewrite an official pick.
Once the previous card is settled and reviewed, Blueprint can check the next confirmed event. Its start time, fighter identities, bout order, rounds, and main event must be complete.
Blueprint saves the current card and sources. Four AI advocates, two for each fighter, argue from those sources, then two independent adjudicators weigh all four cases and pick a winner. Missing evidence and source disagreements remain explicit.
Automated checks verify names, sources, and percentages. A fight publishes only when it passes; the official pick, free win probability, and available breakdown stay tied together.
Official picks stop changing. Cancelled fights are marked void, completed fights are graded publicly, and Betting Desk activity stays on its own separate record.
Readiness is checked every five minutes, with a 72-hour backstop for the next event. Verified lineup changes can be processed automatically before picks close; unchanged picks retain their original versions. Betting odds alone never rewrite an official pick.
A prediction is useful only when you can tell what was called, when it was called, and what happened next. Blueprint follows these rules for every official card.
One saved pre-fight version connects the free pick, full breakdown, public feed, and later result. Source checks do not guarantee that every explanation is correct; published corrections make identified errors visible.
Check whether the call existed before the fight and whether it was right afterward.
This architecture has not yet demonstrated a measured improvement in predictive accuracy. Inspect the settled sample and its size before drawing conclusions or paying.
Start with proof, not a promise
Browse the next card, check the public record, or build a Custom Matchup Report. Then choose only the access you need.
Optional reference material for readers who want the technical definitions, extended method, and detailed performance data.
For every published official fight, you can see Blueprint’s winner, win probability, publication time, and public result. Inspect those first and decide whether the deeper explanation is useful to you.
Paid access adds the likely method and round, main and alternate paths to victory, full reasoning and evidence, and Custom Matchup Report credits. It does not reveal a secret, different winner.
Blueprint considers style, physical traits, available film evidence, statistics, career history, fight context, and preparation. All four advocates use the same research. The adjudicators weigh the opposing cases and which routes are supported; missing measurements never become zero ability.
The adjudicators supply the initial win probability without sportsbook blending or learned calibration. For official forecasts, a disclosed deterministic policy can conservatively cap confidence when the forecast is history-informed or UFC samples are highly asymmetric. It cannot change the winner. Method chances are conditional on that fighter winning, and documented winning methods retain a small residual path.
Yes. After a fight passes roster, identity, evidence, budget, and lock-time admission, the current official engine must choose the more likely winner. With limited tactical evidence it uses the best verified bilateral history, keeps unsupported phases unknown, lowers confidence where the published policy requires it, and states the uncertainty instead of inventing UFC statistics or mechanisms.
No. Everyone sees the same official winner and win probability. Plans change how much explanation and tooling you can open, not which fighter Blueprint picked.
One final official pre-fight pick per active scheduled fight counts. Custom Oracle reports for current, future, or hypothetical matchups never enter the official record.
Predictions are saved before the fights and compared with actual results afterward. Track Record shows wins, misses, accuracy, and whether the stated win probabilities have matched reality over time.
Operational failures hold publication and leave the existing page unchanged. Examples include an unresolved identity, an unconfirmed roster, a source conflict, or an invalid AI response. Evidence scarcity alone does not stop an admitted official forecast. The uncertainty is carried into the reasoning and confidence instead.