Jose Daniel Medina vs Ryan Gandra — By The Numbers
Model Pick: Ryan Gandra (51% confidence via KO/TKO)
Method Probabilities
- KO/TKO: 42%
- Submission: 22%
- Decision: 36%
Statistical Edge
Both fighters bring contrasting skill sets into this matchup. Our 57-module AI engine has analyzed hundreds of data points to produce this breakdown.
The Verdict
Based on comprehensive statistical modeling, Ryan Gandra holds the edge in this matchup.
Despite a significant layoff, Ryan Gandra possesses a technical striking and defensive grappling advantage that Jose Daniel Medina lacks the tools to exploit. Medina's path to victory relies on Gandra's conditioning failing due to rust, but Gandra's historical striking accuracy suggests he can win minutes early. The weighted specialist consensus (3.30 vs 1.50) clearly favors Gandra. The most likely outcome is Gandra controlling the distance and landing the more impactful volume over three rounds. Given the 'Unknown Commodity' status, confidence is capped near the 3-2 split ceiling.
Analysis powered by The Blueprint MMA War Room Committee Engine
War Room Committee_
War Room Committee Verdict [LOCKED]
You've read the analysis. The War Room Committee's call (winner, method, confidence) is locked behind Sharp.
- Overall accuracy70%· 96 fights
- Calibration gradeC· brier 0.232
$19.99 monthly · 5 fresh Live Engine runs · Cancel anytime
Already a member? Sign in
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won Jose Daniel Medina vs Ryan Gandra?
Ryan Gandra won. Blueprint MMA's pre-fight pick was Ryan Gandra.
Who wins Jose Daniel Medina vs Ryan Gandra?
Blueprint MMA's War Room Committee picks Ryan Gandra with a 51% win probability.
How does Blueprint MMA make this prediction?
Blueprint MMA validates and freezes the fight data, then runs 68 Kimi K2.6 agent executions: 33 Winner, 10 Method, 20 Timing, and 5 non-voting Oversight. Kimi K2.6 is the only inference model; LangGraph only orchestrates stage order and state. Winner agents fix the point probability first, Method and Timing agents fill conditional branches without reopening it, and Oversight audits without voting. The public probability is held to a sane 5-95% range and logged before release. Published winner probabilities are AI-only. Market prices may be shown for benchmarking, CLV, and workflow context, but they do not select, rank, or alter the published forecast. If the direct pipeline cannot return a valid read, the forecast is held. Methodology is documented at https://blueprintmma.com/manifesto and accuracy is tracked publicly at https://blueprintmma.com/track-record.
Methodology and Attribution
Author: War Room Committee Desk
Reviewer: Blueprint MMA Research Desk